For all who rely on works of the law are under a curse; for it is written, “Cursed be everyone who does not abide by all things written in the Book of the Law, and do them.” Now it is evident that no one is justified before God by the law, for “The righteous shall […]
Continue reading
Perspicuity Once More: A Rejoinder to Casey Chalk
This post is rather overdue. In 2023, I gave a Sunday School lesson defending the Protestant doctrine of the perspicuity of Scripture against Roman Catholic critiques (accessible on YouTube and as a modified transcript). Stated simply, perspicuity means that the essential doctrines of Christianity are so clearly contained in Scripture (either explicitly or implicitly) that […]
Continue reading
Review: The Invention of the Inspired Text by John C. Poirier
Recently I taught a church Sunday school class on the doctrine of Scripture, defending the Protestant view of inspiration. During the class, I referenced a debate that had taken place earlier between Trent Horn (a Roman Catholic) and Gavin Ortlund (a Protestant). Horn, in arguing for the necessity of the papal magisterium to affirm biblical […]
Continue reading
The Deliverer Will Come from Zion: the Land and People of Israel in Pauline Theology
Lest you be wise in your own sight, I do not want you to be unaware of this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written, “The Deliverer will come from Zion, […]
Continue reading
Alexandrians vs. Antiochenes on Mosaic Law (Part 2)
Note: this is the second part of a paper originally written for a class on the History of Biblical Interpretation at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia. Part 1 can be read here. Evaluation of Origen The advantage of Origen’s approach is that it compels Christians to read their Old Testament and wrestle thoroughly with its text. A […]
Continue reading
Alexandrians vs. Antiochenes on Mosaic Law (Part 1)
Note: this paper was previously written for a class on the History of Biblical Interpretation at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia. Due to the paper’s original length, I will split it into two parts (Part 2 can be read here). Introduction Ever since its inception, the church has struggled to understand the proper place of […]
Continue reading
Resources on Daniel’s Seventy Weeks
24 Seventy weeks are decreed about your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place [literally holy of holies]. 25 Know therefore and understand that […]
Continue reading
Further Thoughts on Modern Bible Translations and Textual Criticism
Based on some helpful feedback that I received on my previous post on textual criticism, I thought that I should write a follow-up post to clarify a few things. To begin with, I should state upfront that I’m a relative newcomer to the subject of textual criticism, and would by no means consider myself an expert. […]
Continue reading
In Defense of Modern Bible Translations: A Case for Eclecticism in Textual Criticism
How do we know that the text of the Bible has been reliably preserved throughout the centuries? If I were to make a list of all the objections that I commonly hear from skeptics against Scripture’s authority, this question would probably come close to the top of that list. It is often argued that if […]
Continue reading
Is Genesis a Myth? Part 2: Genesis and Science
Note: I originally wrote this post on another blog as part of an FAQ for my church in 2013. I am re-publishing here (with minor edits), since I will be using it in an upcoming class on science, faith, and Old Testament interpretation. Part 1 dealt with the literary relationship between Genesis and Ancient Near […]
Continue reading
October 8, 2026 
